Skip to main content

You only live twice: SKYFALL and the resurrection of Ian Fleming’s James Bond

Spoiler warning for the entire Bond franchise - books and films, but specifically for Skyfall. See it before you read this review!


I’ve been a big fan of James Bond since high school, back in a time when the only way to see the movies was when they appeared on television; for some reason, they were never all available on VHS to hire and never to buy. In between seeing the movies on TV and waiting for the next ones to be released (the first Bond film I saw on the big screen was The Living Daylights), I read the original Ian Fleming novels, most of which I bought from second hand book stores.

So, as much as I see problems with both the books and the films, each iteration is of its time and I’m still drawn to the character in a similar way to when I was twelve years old. I just have so much fun with them. But I also adore the character and the world Fleming created. And it’s nice to see his original vision respected, while James Bond continues to grow in the twenty-first century.

Ian Fleming killed James Bond twice. The first time, in the fifth Bond novel, “From Russia With Love”; struck down by Rosa Klebb’s poisoned knitting needles. James Bond falls “head long into the wine-red floor”. End of novel. Fleming didn’t want to write 007 novels forever, so the agent was dead.

But his popularity flourished after President Kennedy put the latest Bond book on his reading list. 007 didn’t stay dead, and in “Doctor No”, Bond is recovering from tetrodotoxin poisoning and sent, by M, to Jamaica to recover. Then he gets pulled into the story of the villainous titular character.

Bond dies for a second time in “You Only Live Twice”, the eleventh Bond novel. The book is about 007 taking revenge on Ernst Stavro Blofeld, the head of SPECTRE and the villain behind the death of his wife Tracy, in “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”. Fleming didn’t leave the reader in suspense this time, though. Bond was still alive, but without his memory, living in Japan with Kissy Suzuki.

But MI6 thinks he’s dead and M writes a three page obituary for him. Much of James Bond’s pre-007 history is first referenced in this ode to an agent by his boss. And just as M did in that 1964 novel, so must Judi Dench’s M pen an obituary for Daniel Craig’s James Bond in the latest film of the fifty-year-old franchise.

Bond, after a thrilling chase through Istanbul, is fighting a man who is in possession of a harddrive stolen from MI6. They are on top of a train, and another agent – Eve, watches on. M, back in Britain, but listening to everything on her headset, urges Eve to shoot the man Bond is fighting – even though Bond is at risk of being shot himself.

Bond is hit. And he falls from the train and into the river under the bridge the train is now passing over. 007 is dead. Cue the opening credits and the stunning title song by Adele.

In some ways, Skyfall feels like another reinvention of the franchise, after the successful reboot of the series in 2006’s Casino Royale, followed by the unfairly maligned Quantum of Solace. But, for me, Skyfall fulfills a kind of promise – both through the evolution of the character, as well as in re-establishing the icon. With each of the Daniel Craig films, more and more of classic Bond iconography appears and by the end of this latest film, it feels like we’ve stepped back in time. But not in a regressive way.

After the first twenty films and forty years of the franchise, culminating in Die Another Day – a terrible film that highlighted the absolute excesses of Bond films (and action movies in general), EON Productions and MGM were fortunate enough to finally get the rights to Ian Fleming’s first James Bond novel, “Casino Royale”. That novel had already been adapted twice – once as a TV special in the 1950s and once as a spoof of Bond films in the 1960s.

After all this time, the character could be introduced to audiences properly, through his first full mission as a Double-0 agent.

Every time a new James Bond is cast, the producers look back to Fleming to remind themselves of the essence of the character:

-          George Lazenby’s completely-faithful-to-the-novel On Her Majesty’s Secret Service after You Only Live Twice’s villain’s volcano lair
-          Roger Moore’s Live and Let Die, one of Moore’s more faithful offerings, after the camp silliness of Connery’s quick return in Diamonds Are Forever
-          Timothy Dalton’s The Living Daylights, which uses a Fleming short story as a jumping off point, after Moore’s stint turned the character and the franchise into a joke factory
-          Pierce Brosnan’s Goldeneye had to relaunch the franchise, after the disappointing box office of Licence to Kill and a six year hiatus, so it didn’t need to get back to Fleming so much as remind the world that Bond existed. It did just that and became one of the highest grossing Bond films to that point

Finding the essence of the character seems key, but it’s not always what a film audience expects. Dalton’s Bond was probably closest to Fleming’s character since Connery’s first two films and, perhaps, Lazenby’s one-shot. But the brutality of Licence to Kill seemed to put people off. What a difference another two decades would make. Fleming’s Bond is a brutal, humourless government agent – a “blunt instrument” and killer with a sense of style. I don’t think any of the actors fully embraced that or were allowed to until Daniel Craig and Casino Royale.

James Bond:
a sketch commissioned by Ian Fleming
Over the years, Fleming’s entire Bond canon has been plundered for titles, plots, characters – sometimes mixed up in a blender before the finished product is served. The Roger Moore films were less and less concerned with being faithful to the source material, so there were elements of the novels which could be picked up and used later. The “He Disagreed With Something That Ate Him...” subplot about CIA ally Felix Leiter being fed to sharks in Fleming’s “Live and Let Die” did not appear in the film version of that book, but was later used in Dalton’s Licence to Kill, as the impetus for a revenge film.

By the time Brosnan was on the scene, the 1990s neutered the character and there was practically no Fleming left to use. Goldeneye was the name of Fleming’s home in Jamaica, where he wrote the Bond novels. The World is Not Enough is the phrase Fleming put on the Bond family Coat of Arms in “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”. The man was long since an icon, though there are occasional whiffs of Fleming’s hard-man character in the Brosnan movies; an injured Bond in The World Is Not Enough and pointed exchanges like one from Goldeneye:
Natalya: “How can you act like this? How can you be so cold?
Bond: “It’s what keeps me alive.”
Natalya: “No. It’s what keeps you alone.”
Casino Royale is one of the most faithful adaptations of a Fleming novel, with a few action set pieces thrown in for modern day audiences. But the relationship between Bond and Vesper is key to the book and to the 2006 film, building a foundation for this new-but-old direction for the franchise to take. Asked if he wants his maritini shaken not stirred, Craig’s Bond says he doesn’t care. But even his love of martinis evolves in the three Craig films: from inventing the Vesper martini, to getting hammered on them in Quantum of Solace, to leaving them behind for the classic shaken-not-stirred in Skyfall.

Vesper's betrayal of Bond is key to understanding the hardened-heart of this mostly mysterious character. Fleming's novel finishes with the line, "The bitch is dead." The film challenges Bond's simplistic summation of Vesper's motivations, leading directly to Quantum of Solace. It's Fleming for another era.

Casino Royale allows a moment to appreciate Bond in a tux, throws in both the modern Aston Martin DBS as well as the classic DB5, which debuted in Goldfinger forty years earlier. Quantum of Solace allows for several threads of continuity, making it the first cinematic sequel in the franchise’s history. But Fleming’s novels were filled with continuity – Bond is often recovering from one novel in the next, or a “Bond girl” might be hanging around in the next book, before he moves on to the next. And Fleming’s “You Only Live Twice” is a direct sequel to “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service”.

Skyfall ups the ante by introducing Q branch, Q and Miss Moneypenny – as well as an office for M, which I don’t think we’ve seen since the Brosnan movies.

The film also uses tidbits from Fleming’s obituary for James Bond to finally explore the character’s backstory – the death of Bond’s parents and an allusion to his troubled childhood and why orphans make the best agents. Writers Neal Purvis and Robert Wade – long time Bond writers and big Fleming fans – have dropped in just the right amount of classic Bond, while John Logan – new to the series – sculpts another revenge film. Yet unlike Bond seeking revenge in Quantum of Solace (or Licence to Kill or “You Only Live Twice”), this time it’s an ex-MI6 agent, the villainous Silva, seeking revenge for how he was so callously treated by Judi Dench’s M years earlier.

(Note: CR gave us Mr White; QOS gave us Dominic Greene; Skyfall gives us Raoul Silva. Fans have long talked about a return of Blofeld to the series, but are we being led along a colourful path to the return of Auric Goldfinger?)

After fifty years, there’s no doubt the James Bond series of films will outlive us all. The character is too iconic to fade away – and the audience seems to have as much fun with Skyfall’s allusions to the past, as it did with the brand new elements. The return of the classic DB5 and the joke about exploding pens seemed to excite as much as anything else in the film. 

The roles played by Ralph Fiennes and Naomie Harris are fully-fleshed out, bringing some extra resonance to the story right at the very end. And villain Raoul Silva is Fleming-esque for many reasons; firstly, the homoerotic tension with Bond and, later, the moment where he exposes his physical scars - as memorable as Doctor No's metal hands or Blofeld's syphilitic scars. Javier Bardem does an amazing job, especially as he faces off with Judi Dench's M.

And the film looks unlike any Bond film. Even Quantum of Solace, so gorgeously shot by director Marc Forster and cinematographer Roberto Schaefer, isn’t quite as stunning as a film under the auspices of Sam Mendes and Roger Deakins. The fight in Shanghai is beautifully choreographed and filmed. But the desolate moors of Scotland and the flame-filled finale are also exquisite.

The score is also a lovely combination of Thomas Newman and Monty Norman’s James Bond theme, as well as riffs from the Skyfall title song.

This is the third act in the re-imagining of James Bond, without forgetting about the past. The producers are being bold in their choices, much like Fleming often was. While the classic pieces have fallen into place, the film doesn’t quite fall into the formula of the pre-Craig films. In some ways, this story is more about M than Bond – and the villain gets a plausible revenge motive. Judi Dench gets to really sink her teeth into a role she's been playing for nearly twenty years - the last holdover from the Brosnan era.

Fleming’s novels didn’t always adhere to formula. “From Russia With Love” doesn’t feature Bond until halfway through the novel. “The Spy Who Loved Me” is told in first person, from the Bond girl’s point-of-view. And his short stories were often character studies, digging deeper into the Bond persona. While his family life was established in “You Only Live Twice,” his professional backstory comes out in the “For Your Eyes Only” and collection of shorts.

Skyfall deals a lot with death and resurrection. It looks unflinchingly at the past and reminds us that even though Bond is getting on (Craig is all of 45, but they’ve made him look older here), suffering from his time in the service and his premature death, that sometimes older and wiser is better. It’s hard not to see that as a comment on this series of films themselves; where the bold reboot injected a youth and vigour into the franchise, the regaining of classic iconography and elements has finally resurrected the Bond that has not only existed on the big screen for fifty years, but in print for nearly sixty.

The title song opens with the line, "This is the end..." But James Bond Will Return.


Hi Keith, I really liked your analysis of Skyfall and the Bond franchise. It's made me want to read the Ian Fleming books and rewatch the Bond films (though I have not seen them all). I thought that the Connery and Lazenby films were great, the Roger Moore films were high camp (except for For Your Eyes Only), I liked the first Timothy Dalton film and the Pierce Brosnan films gradually declined in quality after GoldenEye. Bond's invisible car was the lowest point in the franchise. The Bond films have gone from strength to strength during the Daniel Craig era.

Popular posts from this blog

REVIEW: And Then She Became A Chair by Michelle Myers

  Michelle Myers in And Then She Became A Chair A woman emerges from the darkness, head covered, moving slowly, weighted bags are attached to her dress and drag along the ground behind her. She is in a waiting room. A doctor’s office. A hospice. Inside a commercial begging her to start a new life in Queensland. This is purgatory. Michelle Myer’s one-woman performance, And Then She Became A Chair , is an unsettling, confronting and poetic study in grief. We watch as a woman deals with the inevitable death of her mother, remembering absurd moments of her life, of their lives, in the years, weeks and days leading up to… C.S. Lewis wrote in A Grief Observed , a reflection on the passing of his wife, “No one ever told me that grief felt so like fear.” And it’s this observation that Michelle explores in this work – grief being the fear of loss, the fear of the unknown and the fear of what comes next. It’s interesting that the first work of theatre I have seen this year is focused so mu

Careful the things you say... Joe Wright’s HANNA & the combination of genres

Once upon a time... I tried to write a film script that melded noir and Grimm’s fairytales, where the femme fatale , clad in a slinky red dress, was also (in a way) Little Red Riding Hood. Where the lover of a hit man discovered his true identity from something hidden under his mattress. Evil (step)mothers, adopted children, hunters, princesses and family fortunes. Noir and fairytales have a lot in common and yet... I had real trouble finding the right tone for the piece. And, in the end, my script read too much like I was trying to get the concept to work, rather than telling a compelling story. Saoirse Ronan as Hanna Joe Wright’s film HANNA , screenplay by Seth Lockhead and David Farr, finds the perfect balance between a high tension thriller and a fairytale coming-of-age story. And travels further into the story of this mysterious girl than the trailer suggests. Going in, I was worried this might be too close to Leon or La Femme Nikita – the original films of which I t

You are far away: Agent Cooper and his troubling return to Twin Peaks

“What year is this?” Dale Cooper asks in the final scene of Twin Peaks: The Return , the last of many unanswered questions left as the 18-part feature film concluded a week ago. It’s far from the first time we’ve seen someone who looks like Dale Cooper lost for answers over recent months. But it might be the first time we have definitive proof that he’s in over his head. Mr C, Dale Cooper’s doppelganger, who was first seen in the original series’ finale back in 1991, returned to the town of Twin Peaks with a goal in mind. Mr C was flexible, though. He had to be; he’d set so many things in motion over twenty-five years, if he’d remained fixated, he would never have come as far as he did. Dougie, Dale Cooper’s tulpa – created by and from Mr C, wandered aimlessly through life, but slowly made every life he touched better. Plans change and Dougie changed with them. Slowly but surely, Dougie pieced together Cooper’s past life and became richer for it. Agent Cooper, th

Earth’s Mightiest Heroes: THE AVENGERS assemble on the big screen

I like superheroes. I grew up with reruns of the 1960s Batman TV series. The Superman films were released when I was really young. The Amazing Spider-Man , Wonder Woman and The Incredible Hulk were nighttime TV shows. And one of the defining motion picture releases of my teenage years was Tim Burton’s Batman in 1989. I was never a big comic book reader as a kid – I’ve probably read more comic books, uh, graphic novels in the last ten years than any time before that. But superheroes were always very cool. And Burton’s Batman took my favourite superhero very seriously. Well, until Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins appeared – taking it ultra-seriously and much darker than I’d ever hoped for. As a non-comic reader, I find it hard to align myself as a DC ( Batman , Superman , Wonder Woman ) or Marvel Universe ( Spider-Man , X-Men , The Avengers and its consitutent parts) person. They appeal to different parts of my brain. In effect, DC’s superheroes are often lone warrior

Colder by Lachlan Philpott - Red Stitch

Colder Photo: Teresa Noble I’m there. I’m sitting there in the dark. Sitting there in the dark watching a play by Lachlan Philpott at Red Stitch. A child has gone missing at Disneyland but nothing evokes Disneyland for me, not even the actors wearing mouse ears. Especially not the actors wearing mouse ears and affecting exaggerated American accents. I want to feel what the mother is feeling, while officious behind-the-scenes Disney workers assure her everything is going to be fine. I want a sense of her being frantic and frustrated. But I don’t get this sense because the language of the play is putting me at a distance. The expository monologues don’t paint a picture or flesh out a world beyond the very basic (“padded concrete, padded seats”) and the facile (“padded people”). This choral arrangement of voices is not singing. Eight-year-old David remains missing all day and we learn that his single mother has felt separate from him ever since. We ar

Carrie Fisher: No More Postcards

Two Princess Leias, a medal and some broken jewellry Did I ever tell you about the time Carrie Fisher kissed me on the cheek? Stick around, I’ll tell it again soon. Carrie Fisher was Princess Leia; no getting past that. Except, of course, she did. And then she stepped right back into being her last year. She was the right person to play Leia because she was the right age at the time and she is part of Hollywood royalty. She was also the right person to have been Leia in retrospect, too. Can you imagine anyone else describing Jabba the Hutt as a “giant saliva testicle”? Anyone else who would bring an audience member up on stage to mount a Leia “sex doll” and whip it away before they get close enough to fulfil their childhood fantasy? Actors, even those of Star Wars­­­ -level fame, go in and out of the spotlight. Oh, you could spot Fisher on screen in the 1980s and 90s, but much of her hard work went on behind the scenes, as a script writer and script doctor. Hook , Sist

Walking out... I couldn't do it, could you?

Every so often, I think about walking out of a play, but I can't. I've never done it and I don't think I ever could. I've never walked out of a film, either. It's not in my nature. In the end, I'd rather suffer through the entire thing so I can criticise the entire play, rather than leave halfway and never know if it got any better or any worse. This has come to mind now, not because I wanted to walk out of Terence Malick's big budget experimental film The Tree of Life , but because apparently walk outs are becoming a phenomenon with that particular movie. And in a packed theatre at Cinema Nova last night, the walk outs were notable by their absense when the lights came up at the end. It certainly won't be to everyone's taste. It's very much an impressionistic film that explores grand ideas through mood and beauty, rather than telling a coherent narrative. But, even those moments in the film that were the most challenging on a "need for

REVIEW: This Genuine Moment by Jacob Parker - Midsumma

Christmas Eve. A bedroom. Two strangers, their limbs entangled; the doona cover and pillows hiding their identities just a little while longer. Riley wakes first to chimes from his mobile phone; an alarm or an early morning text message. He carefully manoeuvres himself away from last night’s hook-up and drags himself out of bed. His family are coming over for dinner and he’s got to clean up his new apartment before they arrive. But first thing is first, he’s got to get rid of “L” – the man he slept with last night, whose name escapes him right now in his early-morning, hangover fog. L doesn’t seem in a hurry to leave, though. He’s checking his messages; friends are texting photos of their Christmas Eve barbeque, trying to talk him into coming over. He’s not sure he wants to. He’s also sending messages to someone in his phone known only as FUTRE HUSBND and ignoring texts from his dad. Riley, in a haze, is trying to put the pieces together from the night before. He got wasted at

REVIEW: Stay at Home, Kasey Gambling – Melbourne Fringe

Have you ever felt trapped at home? I know, it’s 2020. If you can work from home, you must work from home. There are only four reasons to leave your house. You can only leave for one hour a day for exercise. No one can visit. But have you ever felt really trapped at home? And scared? Unable to leave. Four years ago, theatre-maker Kasey Gambling created an immersive audio experience for a single audience member on the streets of North Melbourne called The Maze . It’s still one of the most memorable pieces of art I have ever experienced, headphones in and following a woman on the street. Wearing headphones on the street can get you killed. At home, they should be a form of escape – listen to music, listen to podcasts, phone a friend. And yet, Kasey’s new show, Stay at Home , isn’t an escape. It’s another immersive audio experience, but this time you’re not following a woman, you’re in her shoes. But this is your house. How well do you know your own house? You’d think, after loc

REVIEW: BURN THIS by Lanford Wilson

  Mark Diaco as Pale in Burn This After attending the funeral of her roommate Robbie, and his partner Dom, killed in a freak boating accident, Anna and her other roommate, Larry, must deal with the heartbreak of their sudden loss. Soon joining them is Anna’s long-time boyfriend, Burton, and later – in the middle of the night – Robbie’s brother, Pale. Together, they dance around their feelings, trying to deal with their grief – alternating between opening up to each other and shutting down. Lanford Wilson’s play was first performed off-Broadway in 1987 and while the text gives the actors a lot to play with, this new production at 45 Downstairs made me wonder, “Why now?” The question is a double-edged sword; some plays are just so good, that reviving them can be relevant any time. Some plays, even if they are dated, can feel like interesting time capsules – an insight into a time gone by, a world that no longer exists. “Why now” can be a question for creatives, to dig into why it’s a