Skip to main content

On reading and reviews...



Photo by Fiona Bulle

Reading.

Last night, the Cold Readings Series (CRS) hosted a reading of my new full-length play, “A Modern Superwoman”. CRS usually focuses on film scripts and mostly reads extracts. This is only the second time they’ve read a full-length script; the first was the screenplay for “41”, which was released as a feature film last year.

“Superwoman” is in its fourth draft at the moment. I’ve been developing it for a while now, but most the script was written in the last twelve months. Some of the scenes that were read last night, were only written last week. After the third draft, I got some feedback that suggested the play was underwritten – that connections between the characters were vague and their relationships suffered because of that.

In this latest draft, I’ve tried to making everything a little more explicit – without spelling everything out. And at this stage, it’s been very helpful to just lay everything out clearly. I can always pare it back later. The reading was helpful to hear what was working and whether bits were overwritten and how strong the connections between the characters are at this stage.

What’s also great about the CRS, is the post-reading discussion. The actors give their feedback to the writer. The audience gives their feedback to the writer. And the writer tries to stand there not looking too defensive or like a deer in headlights. I found the discussion very helpful, given the play’s subject matter and the tricky balance I have with a couple of the character’s stories.

The post-official discussion discussion is much more relaxing, but also helpful – even just as an ego boost. I find at that point, people are happy to discuss what they really liked about the play, rather than in the discussion when they feel like they want to highlight the flaws first up. In all ways, this is still helpful. There’s no point being there if you’re just after praise. The point of the reading is to make the play better and having heard the play and the discussion, it definitely will.

Thanks to Fiona Bulle and Serenity DeAngeles at CRS and to everyone who came along to read and talk after.

Reviews.

I don’t consider myself a theatre critic or reviewer. My blog is about the theatre I make and the theatre I see. I don’t write about every show I see. When I do write about the shows I see, I don’t necessarily consider them reviews. The three-in-one post I made yesterday about three shows I saw in the last week is a good example of this. While there are comments about all three productions, I guess the compare-and-contrast style won’t be that helpful to people who haven’t seen the other shows or who have no interest in seeing them.

I see shows to continue to further my theatrical education, as well as to support other independent theatre-makers in Melbourne. Most times, I pay to see shows. Sometimes, I’ll get a comp from a friend. Sometimes, I’ll be invited to a show because of the blog.

Whatever I post on here will be honest, whatever my circumstance – whether it’s a mainstage production or if it’s a show I’ve seen just because there’s an actor in it that I know. Because I’m not a critic, I pick and choose which shows I write about at a whim. This most recent “review” post came about because the hook of seeing three shows in a week about couples. After seeing “Constellations”, I could have written a thousand words on it alone, but I’m not a critic. I don’t feel the need to write about every show I see – even a show I loved as much as that.

But in an exercise to compare three somewhat similar - though on a very basic level - plays, I was moved to write a little something about them all. Because of that, I only touched on certain elements of each production – and didn’t try to cover them in as much detail as I would if I’d written indivdual reviews for each.

This blog is primarily about my theatre-making and my theatre watching. It is not a theatre review blog. If you want me to review your show, I make no promises. I never want to feel obligated to write a review. I mostly write about shows I loved, but if I didn’t review your show, it might not be that I didn’t love it, it might be that I didn’t have time or I just couldn’t find the hook for me to write about it.

Sometimes it’s tricky as a theatre-maker in a community that feels so small to be honest when writing reviews, especially when they are made by people I am friends with. So, the only promise I make is that when I blog about shows, I’ll tell you what I really thought. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Favourite Theatre of 2018

It’s that time of year again, when I look back over everything I saw on stage and put together a list of my favourite shows. I saw over 100 shows this year, mostly in Melbourne and a small number on one visit to Sydney.

I will link to reviews if I wrote one.
TOP TEN (alphabetical order)
The Almighty Sometimes – Griffin Theatre, Sydney
Kendall Feaver’s extraordinary debut play is about Anna, dealing with mood disorders and medication and the complicated relationship she has with the treatments and her mother. Superb cast and beautifully directed by Lee Lewis
Blackie Blackie Brown – Malthouse Theatre
Nakkiah Lui’s work is always amazing but this production, directed by Declan Green, was another step up for her – the satire sharper and bleaker and more hilarious than ever before.
Blasted – Malthouse Theatre
Sarah Kane’s debut play from 1990s London is a tricky beast tackling difficult subjects but Anne-Louise Sarks nailed it with a superb production.
The Bleeding Tree – Arts Centre Melbourne

A Thing Isn’t Beautiful Because It Lasts: Avengers in the AGE OF ULTRON

The latest film in the Marvel Universe series feels like nothing so much as a season finale. And since Joss Whedon was once the master of creating season finales that were both emotionally satisfying and thematically resonant, it’s good to have him in charge for the second Avengers movie, Age of Ultron.
I’d like to compare it to the epic scope of Buffy’s “The Gift” but it feels more like Angel, if anything. Things change, the world moves on – and the best you can do is keep fighting. And embrace change.
Tony Stark has always been flawed, but by the third film in his own trilogy, he seemed to have found an emotional peace. But with that peace comes the idea that he can use his technology – his faith in machines being his tragic flaw – to create a replacement for the Avengers. He births an army of robots to calm the populace and fight alien foes.
Robert Downey Jnr’s Stark is such a towering figure in the Marvel Universe films – and to make him partly the villain of this new film is a s…

You are far away: Agent Cooper and his troubling return to Twin Peaks

“What year is this?” Dale Cooper asks in the final scene of Twin Peaks: The Return, the last of many unanswered questions left as the 18-part feature film concluded a week ago.
It’s far from the first time we’ve seen someone who looks like Dale Cooper lost for answers over recent months. But it might be the first time we have definitive proof that he’s in over his head.
Mr C, Dale Cooper’s doppelganger, who was first seen in the original series’ finale back in 1991, returned to the town of Twin Peaks with a goal in mind. Mr C was flexible, though. He had to be; he’d set so many things in motion over twenty-five years, if he’d remained fixated, he would never have come as far as he did.
Dougie, Dale Cooper’s tulpa – created by and from Mr C, wandered aimlessly through life, but slowly made every life he touched better. Plans change and Dougie changed with them. Slowly but surely, Dougie pieced together Cooper’s past life and became richer for it.
Agent Cooper, the third part of this T…