REVIEW: ART by Yasmina Reza (translated by Christopher Hampton) – Comedy Theatre, Melbourne

Serge has bought a new painting. It’s modern art, white on white, and his friend Marc is outraged that Serge would spend so much money – 160,000 euro – on a painting he finds so ridiculous. Their friend, Yvan, is on Serge’s side for the most part: let him have his indulgences, let him enjoy an art-form he loves, let’s not criticise something just because Marc doesn’t understand it.

Art (or “Art” as it was published), by French playwright Yasmina Reza, was first produced in 1994. It debuted on the West End, translated by Christopher Hampton, in 1996 and moved to Broadway in 1998. It won the Tony Award for Best Play and ran for over 600 performances.

I have previously seen Reza’s Life x 3 and God of Carnage and I went in prepared for upper-middle class adults tearing each other down, but in “Art”, I appreciated what the play was actually saying. (Carnage is about two sets of parents trying to negotiate after one son hit another in the school ground, but all I left feeling after that play was that “boy, adults can be childish, too”.)

Serge (Damon Herriman) is a divorced dermatologist, who is well-off but not rolling in money. Marc (Richard Roxburgh) is quite over-the-top in response to Serge’s purchase, but as time and the arguments roll on, his real fears start bubbling to the surface. Yvan (Toby Schmitz) is younger than the other two friends and is just about to get married, though wedding plans are starting to overwhelm him. Yvan acts a lot younger than his mates, but in many ways he’s the most emotionally mature of the trio; he got something out of six years of therapy!

The real joy of Reza’s play is that on the surface it’s about what makes art “art” or ART. There’s a tension in trying to reconcile people’s different reactions to an ostensibly blank canvas, but it would feel too one-note if that’s what the show ended up being a treatise on. Marc has some interesting things to say about pretension and the “thrill of the new” but what these three friends really need to discuss is what makes friendship “friendship”. Why, after all these years, are these guys still friends?

Reza’s text is robust and cheeky and the right side of satirical, without sacrificing the realism of three middle-aged men confronting their life choices. It’s a thirty-year-old play that feels set in the 1990s, even if the production doesn’t want you to think about that. The play is ostensibly set in Paris, too – but there’s some fun to be had with the laconic Aussie accent arguing about “deconstruction”. Lazy stereotypes about women abound, but even then Reza might be onto something when she’s depicts men who call their wives “hysterical” but are often shining examples of the epithet themselves.

Herriman’s Serge is stuffy and superior in his beige suit. Roxburgh’s Marc is all in black, striding around as if he’s much more down-to-earth but actually as much of a wanker as Serge. Schmitz steals the show with an Yvan who is hilariously awkward, dressed like a teenager who never grew up. The three actors work so seamlessly together, under the direction of Lee Lewis, who rarely lets the tension break. Even the occasional direct address to the audience from each character ratchets up the tension, rather than relieves us of it.

Art is one of the plays where the humour is additive – the more you get to laugh at these characters, the funnier everything seems. But there’s real heart in this play, a critique of a world where men cannot articulate their feelings – about themselves, their friendships or art.

- Keith Gow, Theatre First

Art has already visited Sydney, and is currently on stage at Melbourne’s Comedy Theatre until May 17th. Then it’s off to Adelaide from May 20 to 24.

Comments